The world has entered a new era of geopolitical uncertainty, such that political risk analysis has become a necessary consideration in the strategic decision-making process. Effective leaders need an acute and educated understanding of the drivers and measures of political risk, as well as the tools to forecast risks and manage their exposure.

Here are the top 10 political risks that Eurasia Group foresees for 2017, presented by its Founder and President, Ian Bremmer.

1. Unpredictable America

The world’s sole superpower was once the international trump card, imposing order to force compromise and head off conflict. Now it’s a wildcard because, instead of creating policies designed to bolster global stability, President Trump will use U.S. power overwhelmingly to advance U.S. interests, with little concern for the broader impact.

Trump is no isolationist. He’s a unilateralist. Expect a more hawkish — and a much less predictable — U.S. foreign policy. Allies, especially in Europe and Asia, will hedge. Rivals like China and even Russia will test. U.S.-led institutions will lose more of their international clout.

2. China Overreacting

China’s leadership transition will create risks that matter far beyond that country’s borders. The need to maintain control of the transition ahead of the Party Congress in the fall [of 2017] will increase the risk of economic policy mistakes that rattle foreign investors and international markets. In addition, President Xi Jinping knows this is a dangerous time to look weak and irresolute. Provocations from Trump and the sheer number of places where U.S.-China tensions might play out — North Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, the East and South China Seas — make 2017 a dangerous year for China, and all who depend on it for growth and stability.

3. A Power Vacuum in Europe

Strong leadership from Angela Merkel has proven indispensable for Europe’s ability to manage crises in recent years. Europe will face more challenges in 2017—from France’s elections, Greece’s finances, Brexit negotiations, and delicate relations with both Russia and Turkey.

Unfortunately, though Merkel is likely to win re-election as Germany’s chancellor in 2017, she’ll emerge as a weakened figure. This will leave Europe with no strong leadership at all, at a time when strong leaders are badly needed.

4. A Pause in Economic Progress

Don’t expect a surge in needed economic reforms in 2017. Some leaders, like India’s Modi and Mexico’s Pena Nieto, have accomplished as much as they can for now. In France and Germany, reform will wait until after coming elections, and China faces an all-consuming leadership transition in the fall. Turkey’s Erdogan, Britain’s May, and South Africa’s Zuma are fully occupied at the moment with domestic political challenges. In Brazil, Nigeria, and Saudi Arabia, ambitious plans will advance, but fall short of what’s needed.

5. Technology Disrupting the Middle East

Each year, governments in the Middle East lose more of their legitimacy. Technological change is further weakening an already fragmenting region. The risks are both top-down and bottom-up. The revolution in energy production undermines the stability of states still deeply dependent on oil and gas exports for state revenue. Automation of the workplace will make it even harder to create jobs for growing numbers of young people. New communications technologies continue to enhance the ability of angry citizens to find like minds and to organize. Cyber conflict is further shifting the region’s precarious balance of power. Finally, “forced transparency” (think Wikileaks, etc.) is especially dangerous for brittle authoritarian regimes.

6. Politics Interfering with Central Banks

Western central banks are increasingly vulnerable to the same sort of crude political pressures that distort economies in developing countries. In 2017, there’s a risk that Trump will use the Fed as a political scapegoat, putting new pressure on future Fed decisions. He might also eventually use Janet Yellen’s departure — her term is due to end in February 2018 — to replace her with a personal ally, undermining the Fed’s credibility for years.

This isn’t just a U.S. risk. Britain’s Theresa May has blamed the Bank of England for low rate policies that have increased income inequality. In Germany, Wolfgang Schäuble has argued that low interest rates have reduced the incentive for peripheral European states to accept the need for reform.

7. The White House vs. Silicon Valley

President Trump and the tech sector don’t have much in common. Trump wants security and control. The techs want freedom and privacy for their customers. Trump wants jobs. The techs want to push automation into overdrive. The two sides differ substantially on investment in science. In 2017, there will be plenty for Trump and the giants of Silicon Valley to fight over.

8. Turkey’s Ongoing Crackdown 

President Erdogan continues to use an ongoing state of emergency to seize control of day-to-day affairs and tighten his hold on the judiciary, bureaucracy, media, and even business sector through waves of arrests and purges. In 2017, he’ll likely use a referendum to formalize his powers, and his tightening grip will exacerbate the country’s economic problems and his worsening relations with Europe and his neighbors. It’s a volatile player in an increasingly volatile region.

9. North Korea Rattling Its Saber 

It’s hard to know exactly when North Korea will have a missile capability that poses a clear and immediate danger to the United States, but the DPRK appears to be approaching the finish line. Kim Jong Un said in his New Year’s message that preparations for launching an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) had “reached the final stage” — though as ever with North Korea, that claim has not been independently confirmed. At a time of dangerously deteriorating relations between China and the United States, the two countries that will have to work together to manage the fallout, a belligerent North Korea is an especially dangerous arena of great power conflict.

10. A Struggling South Africa

The deeply unpopular President Jacob Zuma, beset by corruption allegations, is afraid to pass power to someone he doesn’t trust. The resulting infighting over succession stalls any momentum toward crucial economic reform in the country and limits South Africa’s ability to offer leadership needed to stabilize conflicts inside neighboring countries.

This article was adapted with permission from the original published in Time Magazine by Ian Bremmer on January 3, 2017.

Get monthly Insights

Sign up for our newsletter! Privacy Policy