People sit around a map of the world and discuss understanding cultures

Turnaround Leadership: The Differences Between Japan and the West

What's the best way for leaders to communicate a shift in corporate strategy? How do you even know when it's time for such a change? This course explains how Japan might have one answer, Western companies another.

GLOBIS University lecturer Megumi Taoka supervised the Japanese translation of Erin Meyer’s The Culture Map: Breaking Through the Invisible Boundaries of Global Business. It’s an essential read for anyone struggling with understanding cultures. The article below is based on talk Taoka gave on October 19, 2015, for Eiji Press and Academy Hills in Tokyo.

Why did you choose this particular book?

In 2014, I was leading a small team developing a new GLOBIS course entitled Cross Cultural Management. Most cross-cultural seminars and training programs focus on communication tips—how deeply one should bow when meeting people, or how direct one could be in e-mails in a particular country, etc.

What we aimed to achieve through the new course, however, was beyond communication tips. We wanted to have students debate how to be an effective leader while working overseas and/or with people of different nationalities. In the course, we touch on the cultures of India, Bahrain, China, the United States, and Japan using case studies. As we put the course together, we were looking for a book that allowed students to pursue deeper debate for understanding cultures through both concepts and concrete business situations.

Turnaround Leadership: The Differences Between Japan and the West

What's the best way for leaders to communicate a shift in corporate strategy? How do you even know when it's time for such a change? This course explains how Japan might have one answer, Western companies another.

As it turned out, Professor Erin Meyer had just authored The Culture Map that year in May. By chance, one of the team members had taken a course with Professor Meyer at INSEAD in France. After ordering her book, we quickly realized we should put it to use as soon as possible—but there was no Japanese version.

We approached Eiji Press for a translation, and the book got published August 22 a year later. We are already entering a second printing, thanks to the great demand among Japanese businesspeople for the help understanding cultures.

The Culture Map (Japanese translation)

What are the 8 scales for visualizing culture?

The first feature of this book is that it describes business situations from a cultural perspective. I’m sure that you have experience understanding cultures through various relationships with friends or others, but a book that focuses on culture in the context of business is in fact not so easy to find.

One of the signature books of this field is Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, by Geert Hofstede, one of the greats of comparative culture studies. But in the twenty years since his book came out, the field has not seen a major update. So it was great to see a new business book focused on understanding cultures the way Meyer’s does.

One of the key aspects of The Culture Map is that it is designed so that a businessperson can make immediate use of it. The Culture Map uses intuitive scales for visualizing how cultural difference emerges in people’s actions in typical business scenarios. There are eight of them.

1. Communicating: Low-context vs. High-context

Low-context: Good communication is precise, simple, and clear. Messages are expressed and understood at face value. 
High-context: Good communication is sophisticated, nuanced, and layered. Messages are both spoken and read between the lines.

2. Evaluating: Direct feedback vs. Indirect feedback 

Direct feedback: Negative feedback is provided frankly, bluntly, and honestly without being softened by positive feedback. 
Indirect feedback: Negative feedback is provided softly, subtly, and diplomatically while given within positive feedback.

3. Persuading: Applications-first vs. Principles-first

Application-first: Individuals are trained to begin with a fact, statement, or opinion before adding concepts to back up or explain the conclusion as necessary.
Principle-first: Individuals are trained to first develop the theory or complex concept before presenting a fact, statement, or opinion.

4. Leading: Egalitarian vs. Hierarchical

Egalitarian: The best boss is a facilitator among equals. Organizational structure is flat.
Hierarchical: The best boss is a strong director who leads from the front. Organizational structure is multilayered and fixed.

Next Article

How to Foster Creativity for Better Virtual Collaboration

Creativity will be a key differentiator for the future of work. How do you manage global teams for virtual collaboration?
A global team of various nationalities and ethnicities communicate for virtual collaboration with superimposed video windows

How to Live Happily Ever After (Socially Speaking) in Japan’s High-Context Culture

Non-Japanese visitors and residents often find Japanese unspoken cultural norms frustrating. But there’s a secret to decoding Japan’s high-context culture.
Black-and-white image of Japanese people riding escalators with strict etiquette to stand on the right side, observing a high-context culture

5. Deciding: Consensual vs. Top-down

Consensual: Decisions are made in groups through unanimous agreement. 
Top-down: Decisions are made by individuals (usually the boss). 

6. Trusting: Task-based vs. Relationship-based

Task-based: “You do good work consistently” means “You are reliable.” “I enjoy working with you” means “I trust you.”
Relationship-based: “I’ve seen who you are at a deep level, I’ve shared personal time with you over meals and drinks, and I know others well who trust you” means “I trust you.”

7. Disagreeing: Confrontational vs. Avoid confrontation

Confrontational: Disagreement and debate are positive for the team or organization. Open confrontation is appropriate and will not negatively impact the relationship.
Avoids confrontation: Disagreement and debate are negative for the team or organization. Open confrontation is inappropriate and will break group harmony or negatively impact the relationship.

8. Scheduling: Linear-time vs. Flexible-time

Linear-time: Focus is on the deadline and sticking to the schedule. Emphasis is on promptness and good organization. 
Flexible-time: Tasks can be changed as opportunities arise. Many things can be dealt with at once, and interruptions are acceptable.

The book explains how these eight scales apply to each country and in which context. This allows you to roughly benchmark your country’s position relative to others when doing business in an international context—and get better at understanding cultures. It goes without saying, of course, that there are always individual differences from person to person, so these benchmarks are not universal.

The Culture Map, by Erin Meyer

What value does this book have for Japanese business today?

In the Cross Cultural Management course, we talk about “cultural intelligence,” which is composed of three elements: cultural knowledge, awareness, and skills to adjust one’s actions and behaviors according to different cultural contexts.

These three are distinctly different abilities. Knowing key cultural facts and issues is one thing, while the ability to translate such knowledge into appropriate actions and behaviors is another. In other words, understanding cultures doesn’t necessarily mean you’re prepared to interact with them.

The Culture Map is extremely useful in building overall cultural knowledge and understanding, as things can only begin from this first step. Professor Meyer goes on to give specific suggestions for how to engage with other cultures, so the book is full of hints on how to put theory into practice.

On the other hand, how much we relate to what this book explains may vary depending on each individual’s level of exposure to diverse cultural contexts.

When debating in the Cross Cultural Management course taught in Japanese, the majority of responses tends to be very subdued and distant. It’s common to hear, “I see, that may be one way of looking at it.” However, in the same class taught in English, even Japanese participants tend to show stronger opinions and clearer disagreements to match their international peers. There is a higher level of awareness and skill to express themselves in a non-Japanese context. These abilities were surely built through actual experiences—not just understanding cultures, but dealing with them.

The development of cultural awareness and skills to adjust actions and behaviors requires substantial hands-on cultural experience, as well as diligent studies using good references—such as this book.

Connect with Insights

Trouble keeping up with all the insights? Subscribe to our newsletter for monthly career inspiration right in your inbox!
Your newsletter subscription with us is subject to the GLOBIS Privacy Policy.