Leading High Performing Remote Teams
How can leaders ensure that performance remains high in remote or hybrid-work environments?
Content Marketing
In this course, you’ll learn how compelling blogs, videos, podcasts, and other media can reach customers and drive sales. You’ll also learn steps for creating an effective content marketing plan, and some important ways to measure its impact and success.
Content marketing is a essential digital marketing strategy for companies looking to provide relevant and useful information to support your community and attract new customers.
Get started on your content marketing journey today.
Sustainable Innovation in Times of Disruption: Choices for a Better Society
There are opportunities for progress all around us. The key is to innovate on these opportunities sustainably.
To help identify most effective path forward, you'll need to gain a global perspective to these challenges in an open discussion. How can Japan and the world take action to create a more sustainable, innovative world? Where do you fit in?
It's time to find out.
Social Media & Digital Communications: Impact on Global Public Opinion
Social and digital media have dominated the communications industry for decades. But it's no secret that social media has the power to sway public opinion, and the way in which many companies use these platforms could be seen as manipulative.
What do companies need to be aware of when utilizing social and digital media? How can these mediums be used to better communicate strategically with the world?
Discover what top media and communications experts have to say.
CAGE Distance Framework
Want to expand overseas? The CAGE distance framework can help ensure you're constructing a solid global strategy in four areas: cultural, administrative, economic, and geographic. Learn how to leverage useful differences between countries, identify potential obstacles, and achieve global business success.
Servant Leadership
There's more to leadership than driving a team to profit. In fact, there's a word for looking beyond self-interest to prioritize individual growth: servant leadership. Try this course for a quick breakdown of what that is, how it works, and how it can lead to organizational success.
Strategy: Creating Value Inside Your Company
Have you ever wondered why certain companies are more successful than others? The answer is strategy: internal processes that control costs, allocate resources, and create value. This course from GLOBIS Unlimited can give you the tools you need for that strategic edge.
Strategy: Understanding the External Environment
To plan strategy on any level, you need to understand your company's external environment. In fact, your level of understanding can impact hiring, budgeting, marketing, or nearly any other part of the business world. Want to learn how to do all that? This course from GLOBIS Unlimited is the perfect first step!
Using Japanese Values to Thrive in Global Business
Japanese companies have unique cultural, communication, and operational challenges. But they also have values that have led to remarkable longevity. Check out this seminar to hear how these values help earn trust from overseas head offices and develop employees.
Marketing: Reaching Your Target
Every company works hard to get its products into the hands of customers. Are you doing everything you can to compete? In this course, you’ll find a winning formula to turn a product idea into real sales. Follow along through the fundamentals of the marketing mix and see how companies successfully bring products to market.
Basic Accounting: Financial Analysis
Want to compare your performance vs. a competitor? Or evaluate a potential vendor? Then you'll need to conduct a financial analysis. This course will teach you how to use three financial statements and evaluate financial performance in terms of profitability, efficiency, soundness, growth, and overall strength.
Career Anchors
What drives you to be good at your job?
Career anchors are based on your values, desires, motivations, and abilities. They are the immovable parts of your professional self-image that guide you throughout your career journey.
Try this short GLOBIS Unlimited course to identify which of the eight career anchors is yours!
Leadership with Passion through Kokorozashi
The key ingredient to success? Passion.
Finding your kokorozashi will unify your passions and skills to create positive change in society. This GLOBIS Unlimited course will help you develop the values and lifelong goals you need to become a strong, passion-driven leader.
In the first part of this series, we introduced the core psychometric concepts of validity, reliability, and error. Now, it’s time to get practical. The smallest details in an assessment’s design—the response options and the wording of the questions—have the largest impact on data quality.
This “quality assurance checklist” provides HR teams with an expert’s view on what to look for, helping you spot the design choices that introduce errors and compromise your results. The quality of your data is decided before the first employee ever clicks a response.
The guidance below will help HR teams spot design choices that lead to the kinds of error we discussed previously (method effects, inconsistent interpretation, and random responding).
A Quality Assurance Checklist: Assessing Content Design
1. What Response Options Are Used?
Research shows that the response options have the single largest impact on an assessment’s quality. Below are some of the most crucial response option characteristics that affect assessment quality.

Response Format
The format of the response options dictates the type of information that the assessment can provide and the way results can be used. Let me give an example with a commonly used response option format: forced-choice.
- Forced-choice format describes a format in which respondents reply by indicating which of two options they rate higher (See Figure A: ).
- Forced-choice format is valid for situations in which you want to understand what is most important to a single employee—do they value complex work more than work that impacts society? But they cannot be used to compare one employee to another, to a team, or to benchmark data. A #1 ranking by Employee A and #4 by Employee B does not necessarily mean A values complex work more than B—B could in fact value it more.
- Additionally, the data produced by forced-choice assessments cannot be used with analytic methods commonly used by HR teams (e.g., correlation, regression), or the analytic methods commonly used to create assessments (e.g., factor analysis). If factor analysis was inadvertently used to create a forced-choice assessment, the results cannot be trusted.
Probably the most widely used response option format is the Likert scale (pronounced “lick-urt,” see Figure B: ). While not free from issues, Likert scales can assess a wide variety of variables, have been extensively studied, produce intuitive information, and are suitable for most use cases and analytics common in HR contexts.

Unipolar vs. Bipolar Rating Scales
“Strongly Disagree – Strongly Agree” is a bipolar scale, whereas “Do Not Agree at All – Strongly Agree” is a unipolar scale. The choice of unipolar vs. bipolar is hotly debated in the literature, but for most HR use cases, a unipolar rating scale will produce the most accurate results.
Number of Options
It is recommended to use Likert rating scales with 5 or 7 response options. More options overwhelm respondents, leading to random responding, while fewer options may limit nuance.
Labels for Response Options

Response option labels should be chosen so that they produce the following two qualities:
- Equal Spacing Labels should create equal spacing between options—for example, the difference from ‘slightly’ $\rightarrow$ ‘moderately’ should match ‘very’ $\rightarrow$ ‘extremely.’ If options are not equally spaced (e.g., because they are too similar: “a little bit” $\rightarrow$ “slightly”), respondents may choose at random. And unequally spaced data causes most statistical analyses to produce distorted or misleading results.
- Nicely Spread Response Distribution Labels should result in a nice spread of answers across the rating scale (see Figure B). The converse situations are when everyone picks responses only at the extremes (skew), or when nearly everyone selects the same response (kurtosis). A nice spread makes results more useful–for example, no meaningful differences are revealed if every team scores a “3.” It is also required for most common statistical analyses to return accurate results.
Assessments are more likely to meet the above two criteria when they have the following characteristics:
- Equally Spaced Adjectives: Research shows the following labels are equally spaced:
- Intensity: (1) not at all, (2) slightly (or a little), (3) somewhat (or moderately), (4) very, (5) extremely (see Figures A-D: )
- Frequencies: (1) never, (2) rarely, (3) sometimes, (4) very often, (5) extremely often (or always) (when 100% of the time is relevant, “always” should be used)
- Quantity: (1) none, (2) a little (or a little bit), (3) some (or somewhat), (4) quite a bit, (5) a great deal.
- Encourage Variation: Labels encourage variation in responses. For example, to determine how employees feel when reporting a serious mistake, a “not at all – extremely comfortable” scale will produce skewed results because everyone feels at least a little uncomfortable. Whereas “not at all – extremely afraid” should produce more variation.
- Consider Culture: Labels should take cultural considerations into account. For example, research suggests that Japanese respondents are less likely to choose extreme-sounding options. Thus, in the Japanese organization, it is better to use a rating scale whose highest rating is “very” (とても) instead of “extremely” (非常に).
Additionally, rating scales with the following characteristics are less tiring for respondents to use, and reduce chances of inconsistent interpretation:
- Label all the response options, rather than just the highest and lowest (see Figure B).
- Reference the target construct in the labels (see Figure C: ).
- A “neither agree nor disagree” or “don’t know” label should NOT be used for the middle option on an odd-numbered bipolar rating scale.
Finally, HR teams should hesitate to use an assessment that allows those without an opinion to skip questions, such as with an “I don’t know” button next to the rating scale. Research shows that it has no benefits for data quality and results in less data being collected. (This is different from filter questions–e.g., letting men skip questions aimed at women–which are strongly encouraged).

2. How Are the Instructions and Questions Written?
Questions should possess the following characteristics to ensure consistent interpretation. This is especially important in global organizations where many respondents will be taking assessments in their second language:
- Easy-to-Understand Language: Simple (short, simple syntax, using concrete, specific and unambiguous language), free of idioms and double negatives (“I do not dislike the new initiative”), and written at around a sixth-grade reading level.
- Not Double-barreled: “Double-barreled” refers to two questions in one. For example, “I am motivated when my manager is friendly and caring”—if an employee feels motivated by a caring manager, but not a friendly manager, how should they answer?
- Not Negated: Negatively worded questions—such as those including the word “not” (e.g., “I do not feel stressed at work”) or using the negative form of a word (“I am dissatisfied by my job”)—are more likely to be misread or misinterpreted. Research shows respondents are also more hesitant to endorse negative statements even if they are true (details below).
The instructions should also be sufficiently clear to ensure consistent interpretation. As an example of poorly written instructions, consider Figure E: . Is it asking about emotional frequency, intensity, or something else? Is it asking only about emotions caused by the job, or also about emotions caused by personal issues that continue at work?

3. How Do All the Questions Relate to Each Other?
An individual question is not an island—each question’s quality is affected by the presence of other questions.
- Ordering of Questions: The ordering of questions can affect how respondents answer. For example, when a question about job quality is followed by a question about life quality, research shows respondents are likely to assume they should exclude the influence of their job on their rating of life quality. Thus, HR teams should hesitate to change question ordering, and before purchasing an assessment try to read through all questions in order.
- Positively and Negatively Worded Questions: Quality is degraded in a variety of ways when assessments include both positively (“My manager cares about me”) and negatively (“My manager dislikes me”) valenced questions. Instead, assessments should use all positively or negatively worded questions, or at least maintain an equal balance of both.
4. Are the Questions Capable of Producing the Information HR Needs?
Once questions and rating scales are determined to be of sufficient quality, the next step is to consider if they are going to be effective for the HR team’s use case:
- Capable of Capturing Change: HR often wants to use assessments to determine if a specific construct changes in response to interventions. In this case, questions should:
- Ask about constructs that can fluctuate and respond to HR intervention (e.g., “I feel satisfied working in the car industry” can’t capture HR-driven changes in job satisfaction).
- Reference a clear time frame (e.g., start every question with, “Over the past two weeks…”).
- Employees Willing to Answer Honestly: One goal is to write questions that employees will be willing to answer honestly. Often this means writing indirect and/or positively valenced questions. For example:
- “I work hard: True or False” $\rightarrow$ “I often feel highly motivated while I do my work.”
- “I hate my manager” $\rightarrow$ “My relationships with direct management are high quality”
- Provide Solution Guidance: HR typically wants to use assessments to identify and then solve problems. An assessment is better equipped to identify solutions when it has the following characteristics:
- Tied into theory. HR teams are encouraged to check if vendors can provide a clear and rational explanation of how their assessment is tied into theory, and how it can be used to identify solutions.
- Taps into Causal Factors. For example, Self-determination Theory shows autonomy increases employee motivation. Instead of “I am motivated: True/False”, a good assessment might ask, “I feel pressured to do things against my will at work.” Saying “true” to the latter question not only signals low motivation but suggests the solution is to increase autonomy.
Wrapping Up
The checklist above provides a clear framework for evaluating the visible parts of any employee assessment tool—the questions, instructions, and the response scales. Attention to detail here is critical, ensuring your data is accurate, sensitive to change, and robust enough to guide genuine solutions.
However, even perfectly written items are meaningless without rigorous scientific evidence to back them up and demonstrate they are in fact reliable and valid. In the final article of this series, we’ll unpack the standards psychometricians use to evaluate the statistical and research evidence of an assessment’s quality.




